A Modest Proposal

I borrow my title from Jonathan Swift, who was writing about the problem of starvation in eighteenth-century Ireland. Swift’s proposal for solving the problem, considered one of the best examples of irony in English literature, was for the starving Irish to solve the problem of starvation by boiling and eating their babies. Swift’s proposal was, of course, anything but modest. It was also satire—educated people of the time were not expected to take it seriously. Today’s Republican Party, however, has been proposing actions, while not as horrific as boiling and eating babies, would foster almost as much misery for the nation’s poor. Too many people, primarily Trump’s “base,” are willing to support everything he says.

Trump’s shutdown, of the government has caused even some considered his principal supporters to question the “rightness” of everything he says and does. David Cay Johnson, in It’s Even Worse than You Think, details the ongoing (and worsening) problems with the Trump Presidency. Trump is not, of course, the only president in history to have made a mess of everything. Richard Nixon was impeached and removed from office, but compared with Trump, he accomplished a great deal and was considered brilliant. The Watergate scandal ended his presidency on a sad note, but he went on to write nine books in an effort to rehabilitate his reputation.

Whether we will get an equivalent satirical view of the Trump Presidency remains to be seen. My sense is that it is unlikely, as the time for satire seems to have faded in the television age. Archie Bunker, from the show “All in the Family,” is, perhaps, a precursor of Trump, but the TV character has more redeeming features than seems to be the case with Trump. And, of course, times have changed. Satire is not as popular as it once was. Stephen Colbert of The Late Show is perhaps the best known current example of a “satirical” comedian. I am not sure that anyone’s mind has ever been changed by satire. Those “in the know” can laugh at the the problems delineated, but I’m not sure that satire ever changed anyone’s mind. And if things are going to change, minds have to change first.

I’m not sure how we get from “here” to “there.” The current crop of Republicans is either too worried about “Trump’s base” of support, or is intent on taking advantage of the current situation to “feather their own nests” to worry about who or how many might be hurt by Trump’s policies or what those policies have been doling to our national reputation in the world. To complicate matters, isn’t that stable, either. Two of our main allies, United Kingdom and France have been having their own problems. Malaise and discontent seem to be the rule rather than the exception. When I think about our current situation, a poem by William Butler Yeats comes to mind:

     The Second Coming

          BY WILLIAM BUTLER YEATS

     Turning and turning in the widening gyre
     The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
     Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
     Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
     The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
     The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
     The best lack all conviction, while the worst
     Are full of passionate intensity.

     Surely some revelation is at hand;
     Surely the Second Coming is at hand.
     The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out
     When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi
     Troubles my sight: somewhere in sands of the desert
     A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
     A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,
     Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it
     Reel shadows of the indignant desert birds.
     The darkness drops again; but now I know
     That twenty centuries of stony sleep
     Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
     And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
     Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?

Even if you are not familiar with Yeats and his poetry, it is hard to miss the message of this poem. The reference is to the “Book of Revelation.” Yeats was concerned about the radical politics of his time. What do you suppose he might say about the current politics in the States—and elsewhere in the world? We have gotten ourselves into quite a fix, and I’m not at all sure that there is an easy way out.

Comments are closed.